<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Miron's Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hyper.to/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hyper.to/blog</link>
	<description>Fast Forward</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:35:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Many-worlds Immortality and the Simulation Argument by Jason</title>
		<link>http://hyper.to/blog/link/many-worlds-immortality-and-the-simulation-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-9624</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyper.to/blog/link/many-worlds-immortality-and-the-simulation-argument/#comment-9624</guid>
		<description>John, these are my thoughts exactly. I wonder if you could link me to somewhere I can read more of, or discuss, these thoughts and ideas?  

It does seem highly unlikely, assuming MWI and quantum immortality to be correct, that we are experiencing the &#039;first instance&#039; of progression into a posthuman paradigm. Re-living a simulated version of it seems almost infinitely more probable. 

I wonder how different to the &#039;first instance&#039; this reality actually is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, these are my thoughts exactly. I wonder if you could link me to somewhere I can read more of, or discuss, these thoughts and ideas?  </p>
<p>It does seem highly unlikely, assuming MWI and quantum immortality to be correct, that we are experiencing the &#8216;first instance&#8217; of progression into a posthuman paradigm. Re-living a simulated version of it seems almost infinitely more probable. </p>
<p>I wonder how different to the &#8216;first instance&#8217; this reality actually is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Many-worlds Immortality and the Simulation Argument by John Laurie</title>
		<link>http://hyper.to/blog/link/many-worlds-immortality-and-the-simulation-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-9622</link>
		<dc:creator>John Laurie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 02:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyper.to/blog/link/many-worlds-immortality-and-the-simulation-argument/#comment-9622</guid>
		<description>I think you have to look at it from a first person perspective.

Many Worlds seems to guarantee first person immortality. But a big objection raised to this is why I/we finf myself/ourselves of normal age as due to random sampling we should be of ridiculously advanced age.

We appear to live in an age where rapid developments in technology may be leading to a &#039;technological singularity&#039; in the near future. This may involve full immersion virtual reality and mind uploading.

Many Worlds and QM makes this almost inevitable as this method of survival is far more probable than surviving a large meteor strike, a global nuclear war, or a plague. These things are eliminated from our likely first person experience stack, so to speak.

So, fast foreward into the future (near or distant) and we are technologically advanced.....but BORED! We hanker for the good old days when we were young again. So we simply plug into a simulation called the late 20th/early 21st century&#039;.

I supect there are two versions of such a programme. One where we realise we are in a simulation, and one where we don&#039;t. When we complete this one (where we don&#039;t know) we may then choose to re-enter bits of it with the knowledge that its just a simulation and play around in it. Maybe relive old experiences and do things differently.

And when we get bored with that....go back into a full scale virtual life with no prerequisite knowledge again. Just pick it off the shelf at a future Tesco, take it home, plug in and play for 70 years or whatever.

That, with a great probability, is where we are now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have to look at it from a first person perspective.</p>
<p>Many Worlds seems to guarantee first person immortality. But a big objection raised to this is why I/we finf myself/ourselves of normal age as due to random sampling we should be of ridiculously advanced age.</p>
<p>We appear to live in an age where rapid developments in technology may be leading to a &#8216;technological singularity&#8217; in the near future. This may involve full immersion virtual reality and mind uploading.</p>
<p>Many Worlds and QM makes this almost inevitable as this method of survival is far more probable than surviving a large meteor strike, a global nuclear war, or a plague. These things are eliminated from our likely first person experience stack, so to speak.</p>
<p>So, fast foreward into the future (near or distant) and we are technologically advanced&#8230;..but BORED! We hanker for the good old days when we were young again. So we simply plug into a simulation called the late 20th/early 21st century&#8217;.</p>
<p>I supect there are two versions of such a programme. One where we realise we are in a simulation, and one where we don&#8217;t. When we complete this one (where we don&#8217;t know) we may then choose to re-enter bits of it with the knowledge that its just a simulation and play around in it. Maybe relive old experiences and do things differently.</p>
<p>And when we get bored with that&#8230;.go back into a full scale virtual life with no prerequisite knowledge again. Just pick it off the shelf at a future Tesco, take it home, plug in and play for 70 years or whatever.</p>
<p>That, with a great probability, is where we are now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Moving your Android Contact List to a New Phone by Hrvoje</title>
		<link>http://hyper.to/blog/link/moving-your-android-contact-list-to-a-new-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-9620</link>
		<dc:creator>Hrvoje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 04:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyper.to/blog/?p=326#comment-9620</guid>
		<description>Hi there!

I did all this on my XPERIA X10. But I have a problem. Whenever I delete the old contacts2.db and replace it with the new one, I open the contacts app and the new one with all the numbers and stuff gets immediately replaced by the old one again which appears from nowhere. Funny thing is, if I tap on the call log I can see all the old calls with all the correct contact names. And then, one by one, the names get deleted and only call record show, and my phonebook is back to having none of the contacts from the file I just copied. What can I do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there!</p>
<p>I did all this on my XPERIA X10. But I have a problem. Whenever I delete the old contacts2.db and replace it with the new one, I open the contacts app and the new one with all the numbers and stuff gets immediately replaced by the old one again which appears from nowhere. Funny thing is, if I tap on the call log I can see all the old calls with all the correct contact names. And then, one by one, the names get deleted and only call record show, and my phonebook is back to having none of the contacts from the file I just copied. What can I do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenSocial vs. Facebook API &#8211; an analysis by Social Network Comparison - Web Analytics World Blog</title>
		<link>http://hyper.to/blog/link/opensocial-vs-facebook-api-an-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-9619</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Network Comparison - Web Analytics World Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyper.to/blog/link/opensocial-vs-facebook-api-an-analysis/#comment-9619</guid>
		<description>[...] Danah.org: Friendster vs. MySpaceeWeek: Google/OpenSocial vs. Microsoft/FacebookMiron&#039;s Weblog: OpenSocial vs. Facebook API - an analysisLabels: Facebook, MySpace, Social Networking   var escFun = window.encodeURIComponent ? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Danah.org: Friendster vs. MySpaceeWeek: Google/OpenSocial vs. Microsoft/FacebookMiron&#039;s Weblog: OpenSocial vs. Facebook API &#8211; an analysisLabels: Facebook, MySpace, Social Networking   var escFun = window.encodeURIComponent ? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Moving your Android Contact List to a New Phone by miron</title>
		<link>http://hyper.to/blog/link/moving-your-android-contact-list-to-a-new-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-9618</link>
		<dc:creator>miron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 06:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyper.to/blog/?p=326#comment-9618</guid>
		<description>These commands would be typed in a terminal on the phone, as root.  Yes, Android is based on linux, and you get a shell.  However, you have to root your phone and use &#039;adb shell&#039; to get a shell prompt, then type &#039;su&#039; to get root.  The tricky part is rooting your phone, which is beyond the scope of this article...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These commands would be typed in a terminal on the phone, as root.  Yes, Android is based on linux, and you get a shell.  However, you have to root your phone and use &#8216;adb shell&#8217; to get a shell prompt, then type &#8216;su&#8217; to get root.  The tricky part is rooting your phone, which is beyond the scope of this article&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Moving your Android Contact List to a New Phone by Andrés De Rojas</title>
		<link>http://hyper.to/blog/link/moving-your-android-contact-list-to-a-new-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-9617</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrés De Rojas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 09:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyper.to/blog/?p=326#comment-9617</guid>
		<description>hello there!

I have my contacts2.db in my pc. How do i copy it back to the phone? Just put the file in the SD card and type the commands n the terminal?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello there!</p>
<p>I have my contacts2.db in my pc. How do i copy it back to the phone? Just put the file in the SD card and type the commands n the terminal?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Moving your Android Contact List to a New Phone by miron</title>
		<link>http://hyper.to/blog/link/moving-your-android-contact-list-to-a-new-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-9615</link>
		<dc:creator>miron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyper.to/blog/?p=326#comment-9615</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a nice android resource list!

Unfortunately, call log and mms restore didn&#039;t work going from 2.2 to 2.3.  Not a huge priority for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a nice android resource list!</p>
<p>Unfortunately, call log and mms restore didn&#8217;t work going from 2.2 to 2.3.  Not a huge priority for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Moving your Android Contact List to a New Phone by Dan Dascalescu</title>
		<link>http://hyper.to/blog/link/moving-your-android-contact-list-to-a-new-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-9614</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Dascalescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyper.to/blog/?p=326#comment-9614</guid>
		<description>I use the same method, copy contacts2.db. From what I could see, &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.dandascalescu.com/howtos/android#How_to_backup_Android_SMSes.2C_MMSes.2C_Contacts.2C_Call_Logs.2C_User_dictionary_etc._manually&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;contacts2.db also contains the call log&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the same method, copy contacts2.db. From what I could see, <a href="http://wiki.dandascalescu.com/howtos/android#How_to_backup_Android_SMSes.2C_MMSes.2C_Contacts.2C_Call_Logs.2C_User_dictionary_etc._manually" rel="nofollow">contacts2.db also contains the call log</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brain Emulation by 2030 by miron</title>
		<link>http://hyper.to/blog/link/brain-emulation-2030/comment-page-1/#comment-9612</link>
		<dc:creator>miron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 01:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyper.to/blog/?p=302#comment-9612</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an excellent point.  Current cache BW is 32GB/s per core.  So if you have, for example, 512 cores, that&#039;s 16TB/s, which is already good enough.

So, 2025 seems likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an excellent point.  Current cache BW is 32GB/s per core.  So if you have, for example, 512 cores, that&#8217;s 16TB/s, which is already good enough.</p>
<p>So, 2025 seems likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brain Emulation by 2030 by cesium62</title>
		<link>http://hyper.to/blog/link/brain-emulation-2030/comment-page-1/#comment-9611</link>
		<dc:creator>cesium62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hyper.to/blog/?p=302#comment-9611</guid>
		<description>&quot;Based on a 1KHz update rate, this works out to 14 TB/s.  This figure is about 3 orders of magnitude higher than current technology.&quot;

This is incorrect.  You are looking at a compute node with 100 TFLOPS and 10GB.  Current computers are on the order of 30GFLOPS and 30GB of main memory, but 30MB of cache memory.  Thus we would expect your 100TFLOPS compute node to have at least 30GB of cache memory.  So you should compare to level 2 cache memory access times, not main memory access times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Based on a 1KHz update rate, this works out to 14 TB/s.  This figure is about 3 orders of magnitude higher than current technology.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is incorrect.  You are looking at a compute node with 100 TFLOPS and 10GB.  Current computers are on the order of 30GFLOPS and 30GB of main memory, but 30MB of cache memory.  Thus we would expect your 100TFLOPS compute node to have at least 30GB of cache memory.  So you should compare to level 2 cache memory access times, not main memory access times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

